You are correct, I did not understand the situation, and I understand it better now. On my side, I prefer to see this $664 used by developers to improve Krita rather to see it used to paid a certificate to not show a useless warning…Īnd here some reading, if you’re interested by the subject:ĭigiCert EV Code Signing Certificates | ĭigiCert brings the extended validation you're used to from EV SSL certificates to EV Code Signing, offering even greater security and Thanks for the informative reply. So finally, as said, it’s Ok if you choose to not update, it doesn’t help Krita and developer who spent time on it, but that’s your choiceīut, just be aware about how the thing you’re trusting in is really working. You trust a developer that is able to paid around $660/year to not show you a warning.You trust other people (you don’t know them more than the software developer, but ok).Just paid Microsoft to bypass this warning.As said, the more people will trust installation, the more it will be recognized as a known software and then, warning will disappear if enough users trust it.So, how softwares can pass through this warning? ![]() This is not a message to tell that software is bloated or contains viruses… ![]() ![]() The SmartScreen is just warning to inform that you’re about to execute a software that is not really known by Microsoft.Įven if software is signed with a valid certificate I trust Defender and am not going to override it.īut I think you don’t really know what you’re really trusting about…
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |